Myself, Olivia Jifcovici, undertaking to formalize the manifesto for sovereign women while noting the innate perplexity & contradiction embedded in the western structures between the founding principles aspirations & the absence & containment of in existence

—

🔹 Formal Argument – On Women’s Sovereignty and the Western Contradiction

Proposition:
The concept of women’s sovereignty, though seemingly birthed through the foundational values of Western civilization, is systematically undermined by the very structures that claim to uphold it.

Premises:

1. Foundational Principles
Western civilization is built on Enlightenment ideals such as individual liberty, personal autonomy, legal equality, and the pursuit of self-determination.


2. Conceptual Inclusion
These ideals provided the intellectual and legal framework that later allowed for the emergence of women’s rights, including the notion of bodily, intellectual, economic, and spiritual sovereignty.


3. Systemic Exclusion
Despite this, the actual structures of the West—governance, law, capitalism, religion, and digital systems—were and remain predominantly male-coded and male-preserving.


4. Structural Contradiction
These systems covertly reframe or restrict women’s autonomy through transactional roles, reproductive expectations, erasure in historical narratives, exclusion from foundational code, and coercive social engineering.



Conclusion:
Thus, while Western ideals enabled the articulation of women’s sovereignty, the Western system as constructed remains intrinsically in contradiction with its realization, marketing liberation while engineering containment.


—

🔹 Manifesto Paragraph – On the Western Perplexity

The sovereignty of women—of mind, body, time, and purpose—was permitted to surface through the language of Western foundational principles: liberty, autonomy, and self-determination. Yet this emergence is not without betrayal. The very system that professes these freedoms is coded in male priorities, protected by patriarchal scaffolding, and sustained through institutions that relegate women to transactional, reproductive, or ornamental roles. This is the innate contradiction: that the West proclaims emancipation while institutionalizing containment. It offers vocabulary without practice, form without function, rights without access. Women’s sovereignty, therefore, does not flourish within the system—it resists despite it.