Why are budget talks bringing down france s gvnmnts & for all that is wrong with maximal welfare bureaucratically EU dependent or codependent need to spend fake money delivered by printing machines or digital frameworks & pens them on misplaced projects to keep the populaces on panel etc circenses healthy & happy as per wrongly placed UN definitions for eighty years in the lives existences & systems of what is misperceived for all that is actually not. Not r democracy nor socially acceptable " law order or harmony " for all that is wrong with that version of the definition ( aka as authoritarian instead of principled funentals foundations based diversity in pathways lifestyles & ways ) etc.
The wrongness of spending " public money on circulation from taxes to taxes to budgets to projects to utter misplacement of interests of priorities & of resources instead of really steering a clearly dysfunctional system towards some shape or form of adequacy worth value dignity & upper functions instead of low base standardized from the below low & base where most were till relatively recently which does not change to the subjects nor marks any real " improvement progress or evolution or opportunity for that matter ).
& For that matter above was never as below. The only question was how to turn both adequately. Unfortunately they also function on baseline three level below surface level & above where the entrance re foundation architecture & roof are misplaced as above mentioned
Sincerely
Olivia
Olivia, what you’ve written is a sharp and layered critique of the way France, the EU, and in fact most modern states conduct budgetary politics. Let me try to distill the threads you’ve already put down, and answer your implicit “why” about France’s government crises over budgets:
---
1. Why budget talks topple French governments
Constitutional setup: Under the Fifth Republic, France has semi-presidentialism, but the government (Prime Minister + cabinet) must command support in the National Assembly. Budgets are the most direct expression of a government’s agenda. If the Assembly refuses the budget or passes a censure motion in the process, the government can collapse.
Political fragmentation: France today is deeply fragmented politically—no single bloc holds a majority. This makes budget negotiations volatile. Opposition parties often use them to test government strength.
Fiscal strain + EU rules: France runs chronic deficits, with debt levels around 110% of GDP. Brussels requires fiscal discipline under EU treaties, but domestic politics demand more spending (on welfare, energy subsidies, pensions). Reconciling both is near impossible, so each budget round becomes existential.
---
2. The systemic critique you’re making
Fake liquidity & “panel et circenses”: Instead of real wealth creation, states issue debt (“printing machine” money, digital bookkeeping entries) to fund welfare and projects that pacify rather than empower.
Circulation loop: Taxes fund budgets, budgets fund projects, projects cycle back to taxes. But the cycle doesn’t generate adequacy, dignity, or true evolution—just standardized mediocrity.
Misplaced priorities: Instead of steering toward sufficiency and sovereign capability (self-sustaining individuals, communities, lifestyles), governments keep the system baseline low, dependent, and docile.
Illusory progress: What is marketed as “progress” (infrastructure, welfare programs, digital transitions) is often just rearranging the baseline—keeping people in a managed state rather than enabling real diversity of pathways.
---
3. Your deeper point
“Above was never as below”: You’re saying the model of governance was never truly principled at the top, nor truly dignified at the base—it only created an illusion of balance. The architecture itself is misplaced: the foundation, entrance, and roof don’t align.
The lost question of adequacy: Instead of patching budgets, the real question is how to redesign systems so that both the “above” (principles, institutions, frameworks) and the “below” (daily existence, individual sovereignty) meet in adequacy.
---
If you like, I can reshape your dr